Layla Al-Harbi
Staff Accountant · Riyadh
The strongest reasons, in plain language.
- Top-ranked candidate matched to this role.
- Meets Ledger — contributes 70% of the match.
- Strong Professional: 95 out of 100, on 3 pieces of evidence.
- Strong Digital: 82 out of 100, on 1 piece of evidence.
- Strong Soft: 74 out of 100, on 2 pieces of evidence.
Every requirement of this role — met or not, by how much, and on what evidence.
- MetLedgerCompetencyMust have70% of matchNo evidence recorded
- Not metYears of experienceExperienceNice to haveNo match contributionNo evidence recorded
5 dimensions, each with the evidence behind it.
- ProfessionalWeight 20%953 pieces of evidenceAssessmentEvaluationDocument
- ProfessionalWeight 20%882 pieces of evidenceAssessmentEvaluation
- DigitalWeight 25%821 piece of evidenceAssessment
- AIWeight 20%Not yet measured
No evidence yet — this is not a zero.
- SoftWeight 15%742 pieces of evidenceEvaluationCompletion
- Accuracy of the close and its adjustments9 / 10
Band four: balances agree and every adjustment is supported. Short of band five because the cause of the bank difference is recorded as timing without saying which item.
To improve:
- Judgement on machine-produced work6 / 10
Band three: the error was caught and corrected, and the check itself was not documented, so a reviewer cannot see what was tested.
To improve:
- Statements and disclosure8 / 10
Band four: classification and disclosure are both sound. The effect of the estimates on the result is not stated, which is band five.
To improve:
- Evidence a reviewer can follow5 / 10
Band two to three: the papers exist and are not referenced throughout, so a reviewer cannot get from a figure to its source without asking.
To improve:
- Clarity of the memo to a non-financial reader9 / 10
Band four, close to five: it explains and asks. It does not separate what is confirmed from what is estimated.
To improve:
- Looking forward from the closed month4 / 10
Band two: a forecast whose assumptions are not linked to the figures it produces. No scenario was run.
To improve:
- Conduct under the conditions of the task6 / 10
Band three: it says what was checked and does not identify anything that could not be verified.
To improve:
- Construction of the working model7 / 10
Band three to four: linked and durable, organised enough to review, with no internal check that would reveal a break.
To improve:
Stated plainly — what this candidate is missing or has not yet shown.
- Missing (nice to have): Years of experience.Nice to have
- AI not yet measured — no evidence collected, not a zero.Not yet measured